首页> 外文OA文献 >Better than text? Critical reflections on the practices of visceral methodologies in human geography
【2h】

Better than text? Critical reflections on the practices of visceral methodologies in human geography

机译:比文字更好?对人文地理内脏方法实践的批判性思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This co-authored intervention discusses themes on the thinking and doing of visceral research. 'Visceral' is taken here as that relating to, and emerging from, bodily, emotional and affective interactions with the material and discursive environment. There has recently been a distinct and necessary turn within the social sciences, particularly in human geography, towards the need for more viscerally-aware research practices. Building on such work, this collective intervention by leading visceral scholars offers two key contributions: first, it critically examines visceral geography approaches by considering their methodological contributions, and suggests improvements and future research pathways; and second, the authors extend recent visceral geography debates by examining how to conduct this type of research, providing reflections from their own experiences on the practicalities and challenges of implementing visceral methods. These observations are taken from a diverse range of research contexts - for example, from gender violence and community spaces, to the politics of 'good eating' in schools and social movements (e.g. Slow Food) - and involve a similarly diverse set of methods, including body-map storytelling, cooking and sharing meals, and using music to 'attune' researchers' bodies to nonhuman objects. In short, this collective intervention makes important and original contributions to the recent visceral turn in human geography, and offers critical insights for researchers across disciplines who are interested in conceptually and/or practically engaging with visceral methods.
机译:这项合着的干预措施讨论了关于内脏研究的思想和行为的主题。 “内脏”在这里被认为是与物质和话语环境的身体,情感和情感互动有关并从中产生的。社会科学领域,特别是在人文地理学领域,最近发生了一个明显且必要的转变,即需要更多具有内在意识的研究实践。在这种工作的基础上,领先的内脏学者的这种集体干预提供了两个关键的贡献:首先,它通过考虑内脏地理方法的方法学贡献来对其进行批判性的检查,并提出改进和未来的研究途径。其次,作者探讨了如何进行这种类型的研究,从而扩展了最近的内脏地理学辩论,并从自己的经验中反思了实施内脏方法的实用性和挑战。这些观察来自各种各样的研究背景,例如,从性别暴力和社区空间到学校和社会运动中的“良好饮食”政治(例如,慢食),并且涉及类似的多种方法,包括人体故事讲故事,烹饪和分享美食,以及使用音乐将研究人员的身体“吸引”到非人类物体上。简而言之,这种集体干预为人类地理学最近的内脏变化做出了重要而又原始的贡献,并为对在概念上和/或实际上对内脏方法感兴趣的跨学科研究人员提供了重要的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号